one of my best campaigns

I helped SkinGraft Designs develop this campaign for their rad line of holster accesssories. Watch out. Cavalli or someone’s gonna steal it next. Naked circus freaks will be hawking you Gucci bags and Armani glasses.

But I highly recommend the original.

    



Subscribe for more like this.






How Your Ad Agency is Sabotaging Your Campaign

It’s your campaign, you know.

You. The Client.

Sure, you’re hiring an agency to direct it, but YOU are paying for it. It belongs to you. Or even more precisely, it belongs to your brand. The ad agency is like the au pair you hire to make sure your baby gets the best care. It also happens to be an au pair that hopes to win awards for its stellar child-rearing, so it’s your job to understand the difference between sheer showmanship and actual skillfulness. It’s the difference between a successful campaign and sabotage.

There are several ways a campaign could fail. There is the once-in-a-blue-moon freak promotional accident, there are the disappointing occasions when some people take things way too seriously, and then there are the much less overt sort of failures, the kind that don’t even let you take advantage of all publicity being good publicity….

Sometimes an ad fails because it’s simply irrelevant. Because it didn’t find the right audience, because it missed the mark on how to communicate its message, or because it didn’t really understand who it was talking to in the first place. A bad advertising strategy won’t make national headlines, but this subtle failure will discredit your brand’s reputation, and it will convince an audience that your message or brand isn’t for them.

You’re counting on your agency to get you exposure; you’re not expecting it’ll make your brand lame in the process!

So what can you do to avoid this silent sabotage?

Well, to start, here are a few things you should understand about what matters in the process of choosing an agency, assessing its work, and understanding the measurements of your campaign’s effectiveness.

1. The ‘Creative’ shouldn’t happen before the Research

Before there’s a contract, all the agency wants is to convince you that they will deliver the most creative, most original campaign. They may even go to astounding lengths to prove their unparalleled creativity, but how many of their unbillable hours go into research? Enough to be certain that the message they are developing is going to be relevant and effective? It may be a creative concept like no other, but does the agency know the campaign they’re pitching is going to actually speak to your audience in their own language? Will it approach them on their terms? It may resonate with the hipster designers coming up with the creative, but not all consumers are made the same….So do they understand who yours are? Does your ad agency know what drives their culture, and how they express their identities? Can their pitch impress you with non-speculative revelations about your brand’s audience that you may not have even considered before?

It should.

The greatest disservice an agency can do to your campaign is sell you on creative without doing their homework first, because they are then bound to deliver what you bought even if its efficacy is questionable, at best. Worse still, any data will need to be skewed to corroborate the agency’s efforts. By selling the creative ahead of the research they are not only doing a disservice to your audience, they are doing a disservice to your understanding of your own audience.

2. There’s gotta be some ‘Creative’ left over for the Media Plan

Half the joke is in the delivery. And it’s half the ad too. Relying on a generic media plan belies a lack of understanding about, or even indifference to your users’ identity, and exposure without a targeted strategy should only even be considered by a very particular kind of brand–unless you’re buying Super Bowl ads, it’s not your brand.

Does your agency understand how and where to access your target audience, and the various subtleties and patterns inherent in the ways your target audience interacts with different marketing channels? Developing relevant and original communications strategies within the current marketing landscape is not about whether you buy ad-space in Filter vs. Vapors, whether you should build a microsite, which keywords to buy, and it’s certainly not about trying to make some video go “viral.” A campaign is no longer limited to being simply printed, broadcast, or even forwarded, it should be embedded. From Red Bull partnering with sub-culture creatives to produce a platform for Ascension from the underground, to Scion planting its car as the coolest item one can “buy” on the popular Tween online community Whyville, an authentic, relevant strategy plays an integral part in defining the message’s form and function.

The niche-ing of all media, multiplied exponentially by the variety of interactive opportunities makes the process of disseminating the message a lot trickier, but the payoff is that it can also make the message itself a whole lot stickier. Knowing how your consumers’ identities shape their interactions with your marketing approaches can be leveraged towards navigating the most important emergent medium: Culture. (Were you expecting the Internet?)

3. The Great User-Generated Content Divide

The average cost of a 30-second TV ad, including production and airtime costs, can run $500,000 to $1 million. Consumer-generated campaigns can cost just a few thousand dollars. So which amount do you think your Agency’s hoping you’ll write a check for?

User-generated content means audience engagement, message relevancy (if it’s not you’ll hear about it right away), authentic endorsement, and even the enablement of culture and identity expression. You should be excited. This is all pretty awesome stuff! But if consumers are making the “ads” for free, then how does the agency validate its cost? There’s a bit of a conflict of interest going on, for sure. Conveniently for you, a cottage industry of startups has emerged to help companies create and manage user-generated content for consumer contests and community input.

Your agency’s validation should lie in precisely this kind of interaction creation and management service. If the campaign concept does not include a function as a framework for enabling user engagement, it is effectively turning your audience away at the door when they arrive.

4. Traffic is not a useful Success Metric

If your site or ad was an art exhibit it would matter how many people were coming by to take a look. Manipulating an audience towards your site for a traffic spike is not that complicated, and it’ll let your agency produce some acceptable statistics for progress reports, but if the audience isn’t getting involved then the traffic doesn’t mean all that much.

Engagement does. From click-thrus, to subscription rates, to form submissions, the measures of a campaign’s success are revealed through audience interaction patterns. Integrated analytics are even better. For example, integrating analytis from an email campaign with site statistics allows not only for a much better indication of a campaign’s success, but grants greater insight into user behavior, which, in turn, will help develop more relevant communication.

Success metrics should be established in advance, but need to remain flexible enough to accomodate change as the campaign evolves. One of the greatest advantages of maintaining this kind of malleability is that it will allow your campaign to “self-correct.” Your community will tell you when you’re missing the mark if empowered with the tools to do so. At the end of the day the more positive the customer experience, the better a return rate you’re going to see.

 

– – –

Employing a meaningful, integrated strategy that allows you to measure and capitalize on the interplay between all the various marketing channels at your disposal is like playing pinball with a highly developed understanding of physics. The way that the ball reacts and moves from one side to another is the same way a consumer traverses your promotional terrain from interaction to interaction. What you don’t want is for your agency to show up, pull the plunger, and bang mercilessly on the side of the machine hoping to thwart the laws of physics by sheer force.

Agencies know they need to change, they just can’t figure out how. Half the problem is they’re so stuck in doing things the way they always have that their approach to new options is still, unfortunately, through the same old processes (uploading a TV spot to You-Tube, anyone?) The other half of the problem is that somehow along the way they’ve become convinced the campaign is theirs, and this sense of entitlement is keeping them from being curious or diligent enough to develop the kind of relevant and original communications solutions that are called for not only by today’s media realities, but by your brand.

    



Subscribe for more like this.






remix nation

when i was originally editing my presentation on the branding of authenticity i tried out an online audio mixing program called jamglue. it worked great up until the time came to export my file, where for whatever reason jamglue simply refused to cooperate. i ended up having to redo it through an offline program, and had it hosted elsewhere, but i left the presentation up on jamglue and totally forgot about it until just now. i returned to jamglue to discover that even in the exciting world of music production, apparently someone thought a girl yapping for 25 minutes merited remixing just the same.

the new iteration is called “the branding of disingenuity,” so as you might imagine it pretty much destroys the meaning of what the presentation is about. it’s a bit freaky, at first, to have your itention misinterpreted, but it’s also a pretty good opportunity to practice what i’m preaching anyway, what with saying fuck “managing the story” and all….

so….here it is….
Remix The Branding of Disingenuity

    



Subscribe for more like this.






Consumer Insight Analysis starter kit

here’s your problem. whoever you are, whatever service or widget you’re selling, you’ve gotta reach your consumer. and 10 years ago “reaching” your consumers meant simply broadcasting advertising at them. but that’s the past. becoming ever more and more officially the past with every word that gets blogged. now “reaching” your consumer means you have to actually get to them, not just at them.

you’ve got to speak their language, approach them on their terms, give them what they want how they want it, and unless you understand why they want it that way you won’t know what it takes to keep them wanting it.

all of marketing, whether it’s an advertisement, a website, or an event, is an interaction between your brand and your consumer. whether you think of your tv ad as an “interaction” doesn’t matter. your consumer does. the challenge now is not whether you’re going to accept the changing nature of marketing or not, the question is how are you going to adapt your messaging to the new consumer demands.

there are a few key element that are good to keep in mind as a kind of compass for navigating the new marketing landscape.

1. experience is everything.
if you can make it interactive, you should. if you can make it even more interactive, you should. and interactive does not just mean on-line. if your marketing plan does not involve strategies for creating meaningful experiences for your consumers, whether virtual or sensory, you’re missing the whole point.

2. relationship is new r.o.i.
promoting cars to savvy 10 year-olds isn’t going to do anything for your quarterly sales report. but check back with scion in six years about what they were thinking when they decided to spend money on an advergame like that anyway.

3. feedback means never having to say, “how do we spin this story?”
encouraging participation goes hand in hand with creating experiences and relationships. when it goes well you get powerful word of mouth and fun user generated content. but sometimes it’s gonna go “wrong” too, and you’re gonna hear about it. that’s part of the deal. if you understand the value of letting your audience feel they are being heard (exhibit a: making news in wired for the merit and audacity of your “wrong” campaign) instead of forcing them to talk about you behind your back, then you should be less worried about what the elevated role of consumer feedback is gonna mean for your future than your media crisis consultant.

4. you can get away with anything except being fake.
you can be ironic, sarcastic, facetious, in fact in many cases your brand identity and/or consumers call for it…but if you’re not authentic we’re gonna feel tricked, and we’re gonna hate you for it. the same reason people don’t want to hang out with “fake” people is why people don’t want to hang out with “fake” brands. so get your identity together, and mean what you say.

5. half of what you’re really selling is identity.
and it’s not your brand’s. it’s your consumers’. you’re not just selling me a pair of shoes, you’re selling what your shoes say to the world about who i am. look at music. whether you like the beatles or the stones, hiphop or indie rock, breakbeats or psytrance isn’t just about the sounds. it’s about the lifestyle choices that those sounds signify about you both as an individual and as a member of a cultural community that listens to that kind of music.

whoever you are, whatever service or widget you’re selling, you’ve gotta keep all of this in mind in order to be able to really reach your consumer, develop a long-term relationship, encourage interaction, be real, and if you’re feeling really stuck use some music–just remember to be sure and make it experiential, not just a jingle.

    



Subscribe for more like this.






the branding of authenticity

a month ago i participated in the second LA Barcamp–an “an ad-hoc un-conference born from the desire for people to share and learn in an open environment.”

anyone can come, and all are encouraged to present something and share their expertise in whatever they feel expert about.

i gave a presentation/discussion on “the branding of authenticity,” examining some ins and outs of what it takes for a brand to develop and maintain an authentic identity in the current marketing landscape. the presentation brings up various campaigns and strategies from a number of major brands we work with at the do lab, including scion and redbull. i also discuss how artists, musicians, and other independent cultural creators fit in on that same spectrum of sustaining authenticity (i.e. “selling out” vs. “cashing in.”)


~
~ ~

listen to an edited version of the presentation…
HERE

(it’s just audio, so multitask away)


~
~ ~


check out the accompanying visuals…
HERE

(the very beginning of the presentation was cut off, but it’s basically just me introducing myself and what we do at the do lab)

    



Subscribe for more like this.