right after i’d written the cult of the gate-crasher post i found an op-ed video of sorts made for the wall street journal by scott karp, responding to the question of whether bloggers can be journalists, and i’ve been following him since.
“The word “blog” has way too much baggage — it’s too often equated with opinion. But a blog is just a content management system, and you can use it to publish shrill opinion, or you can use it to publish traditional journalism…or you can use it to publish journalistic reporting with a bit more point of view.”
he’s totally right. the word blog does have a lot of baggage, and i personally refuse to carry it even though i actually even have… you know… one of those things. i practically never say the word, and i certainly don’t think of myself as a “blogger.” (don’t take it personally, i went to burningman when i was 18, and am inextricably enmeshed in the burningman community in l.a., yet i refuse to say i’m a “burner” either. i’m equal opportunity when it comes to defining the difference between something i do, and who i am.)
what i am is a writer. and there happen to be quite a few other writers out there, with the same sort of approach to articulating a combination of insight and opinion, and publishing their writing using the same kind of content management system that i do. a blog IS just a content management system, and lumping all the people who use the same system into one category, rather than actually examining the difference in the content being produced, is kind of ridiculous.
in a lot of instances a blogger (that is, the content creator, not the system user in this case) is nothing different from what has traditionally been called a “columnist.” you know… opinionated and personal, yet creating something informative and entertaining enough to get to see the light of print. i mean… look at the layout of a blog! they all even LOOK like a column. there may be a nation of blogges out there who all use the same sort of content management system, but i think i’ll claim my allegiance to the nation of columnists.
one of my favorite movie moments of the past decade has got to be that moment in x-men 2 when iceman and the rest of the teen mutants are hiding out at iceman’s house and his mom asks, him “have you ever tried….not…being a mutant?” like it would just solve everything.
i went to see the movie with a whole posse of my best friends, and was sitting next to one who happened to be gay, and he burst out laughing. i mean the whole theater was laughing, but it was even more pointed coming from sean. the question was the kind of thing that no doubt many a gay kid has had to endure from their parents, “well, have you ever tried… not… being gay?”
i think in general we like to assume that there are lifestyle choices we make, like listening to rockabilly, driving a harley, polyamory, veganism, white supremacism. and those we don’t, like what socioeconomic class we’re born into, our skin color, our gender, whether we’re good at math, and who we fall in love with.
technically, now more than ever before the once-immutable attributes of identity are becoming a choice. even those options that we did not pick for ourselves, that are dictated by genetics, hormones, or circumstance, are being challenged by the dissolution of outdated conventions and advancements in modern surgery. in a sense it’s almost like if you happen to have been born a straight female, and are still happy to be one, then it’s almost like it was a choice by the sheer act of compliance, if nothing else, when you take into account the varieties of gender and orientational mashups available these days.
i read dana boyd’s essay yesterday on “Viewing American class divisions through Facebook and MySpace” about the lifestyle segregations that seem to be emerging from the user adoption pattern of the two sites, and what really struck me was the following:
Most teens who exclusively use Facebook are familiar with and have an opinion about MySpace. These teens are very aware of MySpace and they often have a negative opinion about it. They see it as gaudy, immature, and “so middle school.” They prefer the “clean” look of Facebook, noting that it is more mature and that MySpace is “so lame.” What hegemonic teens call gaudy can also be labeled as “glitzy” or “bling” or “fly” (or what my generation would call “phat”) by subaltern teens. Terms like “bling” come out of hip-hop culture where showy, sparkly, brash visual displays are acceptable and valued. The look and feel of MySpace resonates far better with subaltern communities than it does with the upwardly mobile hegemonic teens. This is even clear in the blogosphere where people talk about how gauche MySpace is while commending Facebook on its aesthetics. I’m sure that a visual analyst would be able to explain how classed aesthetics are, but it is pretty clear to me that aesthetics are more than simply the “eye of the beholder” – they are culturally narrated and replicated. That “clean” or “modern” look of Facebook is akin to West Elm or Pottery Barn or any poshy Scandinavian design house (that I admit I’m drawn to) while the more flashy look of MySpace resembles the Las Vegas imagery that attracts millions every year. I suspect that lifestyles have aesthetic values and that these are being reproduced on MySpace and Facebook.
i’ve heard sooo many people that fit danah’s demographic description complaining about the “sub-par aesthetics” of myspace, but it never even occurred to me (and certainly not to them) that perhaps these reactions to visual composition were not really their own, but rather determined by the aesthetics of their lifestyle/background.
even if it’s possible to justify conscious identity/lifestyle choices as deliberate, how the hell do you justify the UNCONSCIOUS ones that way? and just how many of the choices we think we’re making for ourselves are actually predetermined in this unconscious way?
i’ve found that an easy way to explain how identity marketing functions is through the example of the clothing styles people choose. there’s so many styles of clothing you COULD be rocking, and yet you choose the kind clothing you choose, and not ALL the other styles. so…why is that? because you feel that this particular style expresseses something about who you are to other people.
so clothing is a tool for expressing our identity, essentially but who we want to sleep with is determined by biology? perhaps neither of these is this cut and dry. my bioanthropology professor used to say, “everything is 100% nature. and 100% nurture.”
so what about our choices about whether or not we like hardcore drum ‘n bass or reggaeton or sex and the city or tofu?
is our “taste” 100% our own, and 100% not our own?
it’s hard to comprehend this now, but before hiphop there was no such thing as a racially integrated culture. when hiphop came down from the bronx and created the roxy in downtown NYC it brought with it not just a fad, but a complete cultural shift that was ushering with it a racially integrated lifestyle. and the first culture that brought white kids and black kids hanging out together started less than thirty years ago!
FAB 5 FREDDY recalls the turning point as a July night…. “And everybody kinda bugged out looking at each other. You had these ill b-boys with the poses and shit, checking out these [punk & new wave] kids with the crazy haircuts and that whole vibe. And everybody kinda got into each other, so to speak. That’s when it really kinda took off as the first really major downtown club that had like a legitimately mixed scene.”
David Hershkovits, a music journalist who would go on to publish PAPER magazine: “The crowds were very diverse. That was why I was so excited to be there. Suddenly this racially mixed group was having a good time partying in a room together, which was a very rare thing. On the level of music and art, people were able to bridge all these boundaries.”
Dante Ross, who would become a key hip-hop A&R exec during the late ’80s, remembers: “The word ‘alternative’ didn’t exist. It was this great moment man, the ‘Grafffiti Rock’ moment. Everything was all mixed up, it was cool to be eclectic.”
this was not just some studio-54 remix, however. in 1982 afrika bambaataa had released “planet rock.” arguably just as influential as “rapper’s delight“–whose lasting testimony is as the first hip-hop shout that was hear round the world–planet rock defined a “grand statement” for what afrika was calling the hip-hop movement.
Planet Rock was hip hop’s universal invitation, a hypnotic vision of one world under a groove, beyond race, poverty, sociology and geography. [The lyrics] shouted, “No work or play, our world is free. Be what you be, just be!”
Bambaataa says, “I really made it for the Blacks, Latinos, and the punk rockers, but I didn’t know the next day that everybody was all into it and dancing. I said, ‘Whoa! This is interesting.'”
That was the move that proclaimed that this wasn’t just an “urban” thing, it made it inclusive, it took hiphop global.
which is making me wonder: what’s next?
all throughout history the art of miscegenation has been the art of creating cultural change itself. it seems like it’s an essential component for the achievement of a significant cultural shift that it empower inclusivity and integration. on a much smaller scale, i’ve already touched upon the ways in which i see the inclusivity trend playing out in the world of social network app sites, but really, in the grand scheme of large-scale global culture shifts… what’s next?
what sort of social divisions still apply so universally that the act of demolishing them becomes universal?
culture is like the water temperature of a pool: you don’t even notice it once you’re really acclimated. bursting a ubiquitous cultural taboo is like saying, ‘hey, i want a pool with a totally different temperature,’ climbing out, going to get a hose, and pumping new water in. so who’s going to climb out of the pool and usher in the next great cultural revolution?
and what’s the water going to be like once they do?
– – –
more reaction to can’t stop won’t stop: a history of the hip hop generation: HERE
working on music festivals has gotten me to thinking about the kind of presence that these events develop online.
p.t. barnum pretty much laid the template for the concert promotion industry, and in that process also invented the advertising industry. thereafter events and promotions have been inextricably linked, like a codependent couple stuck in a mutually-enabling relationship.
which is not to say that that relationship hasn’t become totally dysfunctional in the past century. after so long getting completely ignored by concerts, which has no passion for anything but venues, promotion turned what was once an innocent flirtation with media into a full-on, often illicit, always exhilarating love affair.
see, because concerts makes its money at the venue door, it doesn’t really see why it oughtta give a crap about “engagement” since “the draw”–that is, the band–changes every night. and so in this precariously maintained way, the concert industry gets away with more or less letting the bands have engagement be their cross to bear.
which is why the music festival website is such a bizarre little anomaly. it’s the rare occasion when a concert promotion company must use its own brand as an element of the “draw,” and thus needs (whether it understands it or not) to deal with engagement media.
that’s like…. imagine having to work with your partner’s secret lover on a big work project that you’re not really feeling that confident about, and you might start to get an inkling of the sort of awkwardness with which the concert industry approaches this whole process.
essentially there are three things that a festival is selling:
1. the event lineup
2. the event brand
3. the event community
like toilet paper, tissues, and paper towels, they’re all made up of the same stuff, and to a certain degree serve an interchangeable function, but at the end of the day, you do buy each for different reasons.
after lightning in a bottle, the do lab’s coachella installation, now working on the street scene music festival, and with all the various other festivals around the world the do’s negotiating with right now, i’ve been looking at more festival websites than i can even recall. but what keeps catching my eye is the way that they all address the above three selling points:
Lineup: HOLY SHIT!
the smashing pumpkins AND the police! M.I.A.!? how the hell did they get M.I.A. i thought the dept. of homeland security wasn’t even letting her in the country?! WU TANG? i’m sorry… WU TANG FUCKING CLAN? wait…. a third time… WU?! (ok, how many members of wu tang do you need to book to be able to put them on the bill? i guess now that ODB’s out for the count it’s easier to get the full mishpucha, but… still, really?)
brand: what else would you expect from virgin?
they’ve been doing the festival thing in europe for a decade now, and while i have never heard of the venue, and i’ve never even heard of baltimore insofar as any music festival conversation is concerned…and i don’t care! i trust virgin’s gonna do me right. way to put the east coast back on the music festival map in a big way.
community: the what now?
ok, granted they’re only a year old, so it’s not like they’ve got a huge community legacy to capitalize on, but really, just getting the chance to vote for a band to get booked to the lineup via mobile text voting is not a legitimate substitute for even so much as a token myspace page link so far as “getting people involved” goes.
* bonus points: motherfuckin KILLER site.
2. Vans Warped Tour – all fuckin summer – all the fuck over the place
lineup: does it matter?
with 45 shows in the space of three months, there’s single bands that can’t even handle that kind of touring schedule, but somehow warped, the pop-punk travelling circus makes it happen. each date has a different lineup, so in a buddhist sort of way, there’s no constant, solid, separate, unchanging, lineup there. but even if you look at the roster for a random showdate all the bands are just listed in alphabetical order, and there isn’t even any kind of top billing to be had here. clearly for warped, it’s not about the bands.
brand: keepin it real.
the 07 site’s few creative elements hearken back to traditional punk tattoo designs. that intimate kind of “we know you know, and we know you know we know” insinuation gets a 10 on the identity marketing meter.
community: THAT is fuckin brilliant.
check it out! warped turned their whole site into a COMMUNITY site. any given showdate’s page gives you pictures of the people who have made profiles for it. the login is actually ABOVE the purchase link! imagine that! having to scroll down to buy tickets! it doesn’t even say “buy tickets” it just says “onsale now” (cuz we know you know to buy them). there are soooo many reasons this whole approach is just genius, i’m not even going to go into it. (if you’re really interested, send me an email: jenka@social-creature.com). suuuper smart long-term strategy thinking.
* bonus points: i’d just like to reiterate again how incredibly brilliant turning a festival website into a community site is.
crap! i’ve run out of time gotta get back to work, so i’ll just rush through a few more, but you get the gist…
* bonus points: that scrolling lineup banner plus the green mission are just like LIB! if only al was running for president! a movie, a book, a music festival?! he’s like a branding empire… it’d be like p diddy running for president.
electric picnic – ireland
with nav. sections like, “comedy and spoken word,” “theatrics,” and “body and soul” in addition to “the music,” it’s evident that this event is all about the experience.
* bonus points for addressing the silent fourth element in addition to lineup, brand, and community: experience.
* negative points for a stupid useless splash page! come on, i get that this year’s festival is sold out, but seriously, having a splash page on a music festival site is like dousing it in bird flu. just… GROSS!
summer sonic – tokyo & osaka
aahhh! the site’s in japanese, i don’t understand anything but that lineup, which actually ALSO doesn’t make sense: black eyed peas, avril lavigne, gwen stefani, googoo dolls? SUGAR RAY? this is like the anti-virginfestival. (does that make it the whore festival?) god you could NOT sell this lineup to a cohesive enough demo in the US to get away with it being a massive festival AT ALL. foreign people are weirdos.
eventually are we heading towards an understand that any platform which facilitates interaction, community (and identity) development, and experience creation is a social medium?
