<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: branding the new impossible beauty ideal is nothing new</title>
	<atom:link href="http://social-creature.com/branding-the-new-impossible-beauty-ideal-is-nothing-new/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://social-creature.com/branding-the-new-impossible-beauty-ideal-is-nothing-new</link>
	<description>culture, consumer insight, &#38; marketing strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 02:31:34 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jenks</title>
		<link>http://social-creature.com/branding-the-new-impossible-beauty-ideal-is-nothing-new/comment-page-1#comment-892</link>
		<dc:creator>jenks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 07:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://social-creature.com/branding-the-new-impossible-beauty-ideal-is-nothing-new#comment-892</guid>
		<description>thanks, john :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks, john <img src='http://social-creature.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john drake</title>
		<link>http://social-creature.com/branding-the-new-impossible-beauty-ideal-is-nothing-new/comment-page-1#comment-891</link>
		<dc:creator>john drake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 07:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://social-creature.com/branding-the-new-impossible-beauty-ideal-is-nothing-new#comment-891</guid>
		<description>not sure about the misogynistic view of things, but just a quick shout out on the post itself... much has been written about this entire dove effort since 2005. despite the huge success, last week&#039;s AdAge reported the dove brand has taken a hit/flattened since they recently started celebrating age with the annie leibovitz campaign. despite all the write-ups, this post is a new slant on things. nicely done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not sure about the misogynistic view of things, but just a quick shout out on the post itself&#8230; much has been written about this entire dove effort since 2005. despite the huge success, last week&#8217;s AdAge reported the dove brand has taken a hit/flattened since they recently started celebrating age with the annie leibovitz campaign. despite all the write-ups, this post is a new slant on things. nicely done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jenks</title>
		<link>http://social-creature.com/branding-the-new-impossible-beauty-ideal-is-nothing-new/comment-page-1#comment-885</link>
		<dc:creator>jenks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 00:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://social-creature.com/branding-the-new-impossible-beauty-ideal-is-nothing-new#comment-885</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;i do not think that dove&#039;s &quot;real beauty&quot; campaign has anything to do with &quot;exploiting the fact that it is socially acceptable to scorn women who don&#039;t comply with the unnatural beauty standards.&quot; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;i think if anything, it is exploitative of some basic human psychology--about as much as a prozac commercial is. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;i think it&#039;s really about people&#039;s own internal struggles, which are informed much more by biological predispositions than any noise about patriarchy.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i do not think that dove&#8217;s &#8220;real beauty&#8221; campaign has anything to do with &#8220;exploiting the fact that it is socially acceptable to scorn women who don&#8217;t comply with the unnatural beauty standards.&#8221; </p>
<p>i think if anything, it is exploitative of some basic human psychology&#8211;about as much as a prozac commercial is. </p>
<p>i think it&#8217;s really about people&#8217;s own internal struggles, which are informed much more by biological predispositions than any noise about patriarchy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allison</title>
		<link>http://social-creature.com/branding-the-new-impossible-beauty-ideal-is-nothing-new/comment-page-1#comment-883</link>
		<dc:creator>Allison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 22:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://social-creature.com/branding-the-new-impossible-beauty-ideal-is-nothing-new#comment-883</guid>
		<description>The marketing itself is not misogynistic, merely exploitive of the misogynistic fact that it is socially acceptable to scorn women who don&#039;t comply with unnatural beauty standards.  I mean, men have never been targeted for things like douches and Brazilian waxes, even though their bits are probably funkier and hairier than women&#039;s.

In a patriarchy, power rules.  And since beauty has been a woman&#039;s most likely route to power within that patriarchy, so is bodily self-hatred more likely among women, although not exclusively their domain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The marketing itself is not misogynistic, merely exploitive of the misogynistic fact that it is socially acceptable to scorn women who don&#8217;t comply with unnatural beauty standards.  I mean, men have never been targeted for things like douches and Brazilian waxes, even though their bits are probably funkier and hairier than women&#8217;s.</p>
<p>In a patriarchy, power rules.  And since beauty has been a woman&#8217;s most likely route to power within that patriarchy, so is bodily self-hatred more likely among women, although not exclusively their domain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jenks</title>
		<link>http://social-creature.com/branding-the-new-impossible-beauty-ideal-is-nothing-new/comment-page-1#comment-881</link>
		<dc:creator>jenks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 21:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://social-creature.com/branding-the-new-impossible-beauty-ideal-is-nothing-new#comment-881</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s funny, it never ocured to me to consider it misogynistic. which is not to say it isn&#039;t... just i&#039;d never thought of it that way. is self-hatred necessarily misogynistic? that&#039;s really what&#039;s being targetted here. our self-hatred, not necessarily our gender. 

the new thing to hate about yourself isn&#039;t that you don&#039;t live up to some crazy ideal, but that you aren&#039;t ABOVE CARING that you don&#039;t. 

i honestly don&#039;t even know how to tell which one is worse. altho one sure does feel more insidious.

i&#039;m sure men are being marketed to as failures in completely different ways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s funny, it never ocured to me to consider it misogynistic. which is not to say it isn&#8217;t&#8230; just i&#8217;d never thought of it that way. is self-hatred necessarily misogynistic? that&#8217;s really what&#8217;s being targetted here. our self-hatred, not necessarily our gender. </p>
<p>the new thing to hate about yourself isn&#8217;t that you don&#8217;t live up to some crazy ideal, but that you aren&#8217;t ABOVE CARING that you don&#8217;t. </p>
<p>i honestly don&#8217;t even know how to tell which one is worse. altho one sure does feel more insidious.</p>
<p>i&#8217;m sure men are being marketed to as failures in completely different ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allison</title>
		<link>http://social-creature.com/branding-the-new-impossible-beauty-ideal-is-nothing-new/comment-page-1#comment-880</link>
		<dc:creator>Allison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 20:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://social-creature.com/branding-the-new-impossible-beauty-ideal-is-nothing-new#comment-880</guid>
		<description>Interesting.  Always fascinating to see how women are targeted in new and excitingly misogynistic ways.  

On a semi-related note, I am curious about your critique on my org&#039;s site on pink-ribbon cause-marketing for breast cancer: http://www.thinkbeforeyoupink.org/Pages/FocusOnPinkwashers.html

This is Breast Cancer Awareness month, aka pink ribbon mania month, which was ironically started by AstraZeneca the drug company and has a very convoluted investment in cancer: http://www.sierraclub.org/sierra/199909/cancer.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.  Always fascinating to see how women are targeted in new and excitingly misogynistic ways.  </p>
<p>On a semi-related note, I am curious about your critique on my org&#8217;s site on pink-ribbon cause-marketing for breast cancer: <a href="http://www.thinkbeforeyoupink.org/Pages/FocusOnPinkwashers.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thinkbeforeyoupink.org/Pages/FocusOnPinkwashers.html</a></p>
<p>This is Breast Cancer Awareness month, aka pink ribbon mania month, which was ironically started by AstraZeneca the drug company and has a very convoluted investment in cancer: <a href="http://www.sierraclub.org/sierra/199909/cancer.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.sierraclub.org/sierra/199909/cancer.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
